Showing posts with label art writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art writing. Show all posts

Kim Pieters' 'Wings Caught in the Tears of The Pool', at Bowen Galleries



Dunedin painter Kim Pieters' show of new works Wings Caught in the Tears of The Pool was exhibited at Bowen Galleries, Wellington, from 8 - 27 September 2008. all of the paintings' titles were taken by Kim from poems written by me, and exhibited with an appropriately non-explicatory catalogue text I wrote for the show.

Documentation of the works is viewable on the Bowen's site here

-----------------------------------------------

there are times when I have lost the characters in this day's fiction as living entities, she says. They pale and fall, and a space opens in which I am absence. I situate myself in my city with the eye of a foreigner. But all looking is foreign. The process of seeing is a series of symbols copied out of books, like markings on this white ground. A parody of some tabula rasa we have never known but in the expectation of it we have created a culture. The ruins have been reconstructed. Buildings are re-facaded. But I am, increasingly, a wanderer of junkstores, disconnected, picking over the cultural debris of a place, a time unknown to experience. The day's slow unreeling as though seen through rippled water

and all languages are foreign you said to me. I, equally free, am not I like a tree trunk, but the weeping tree that inhabits your work, its limbs trailing (like words?) off the page. and how to claim as "mine". the soft branching that leans in its partiality toward silence. not a striving for monumentality, oratory, presence. a distrust of the (meat eating) sun. which would claim the final. the partiality of languaging bodies "such as flesh holds it's sense of incompletion". the untongued inbetween. that you speak. that I

light stumbles into an eye's nodes and chambers. among these inscriptions and silences what body can we? body politic, body sexual, body of sparrow, flock, ant colony. where am I bisecting the swarming softness with words. how not to incise, dissect, stick the pin in, butterfly. but the book follows us home as though we know.

but the drama that exists in the white space. show don't tell, she says. make fluid the fragmented parts. lavish me with absences. exilic anxieties. finding and searching. sleep still travels through like a current, a electrical stream when the foot is stationed at point. like the foot of a snail the eye roots itself in the shelter of image. But you are blinding mentionings inside this sentence as though language were a brick series. As though there were a state of being (in a black jacket). A state of being cocooned (in parentheses). A state of looking from (a centre?) I will hatch, she says

into pure flashes and symmetries. But not metamorphosise, butterfly. Just prevail in the continuing of version after version of human, getting weaker and stronger in patches, like sunlight between buildings, like a sunrise sight out of window and lengthening. grainy, as though on a train, as though raining. these are our hands, our media. the ragged uprise and decline of light on horizons folds my eye into days a long gradient. symbols hang without referent, their white space a mental sea. to fill in the gaps or the gaps themselves are. unknown, new zealand. a hill sequence embedded. gold stutter. language accelerant, the whole rustling and flying. into light. collapsing words as though burning out. the frame.

it is something like writing without thinking, she says. treading these pale squares. a light catalyses a way of walling the silence. margins walked, alive with revisions. this language of visible things and of things that go. what thoughts are public and what. brushed under the appearance, a wall weeps papery foldings. four makes a room. an air shelter, like a body marked by eyes, by the broken parts of days.

The city writes to my eye, and I trace its scrapes of saying. All ground is water, she says. All streets are composed of paper. I have been drowned here, and walked up onto land where I was unknown, and walked into these crowds, and disappeared.



an interview with British-born, then Christchurch-based painter and musician Kit Lawrence was published in Zing Magazine in August 2006.

Kit's artist page at Michael Lett galleries is here

his website is here


























---

DANCING ABOUT ARCHITECTURE: KIT LAWRENCE IN CONVERSATION WITH SALLY ANN MCINTYRE


SM: Kit, you've done many things since moving from London to New Zealand two years ago. You started two bands (House of Dolls and Pig Out) and made some significant leaps in the local art community. You've also recently started a project space. What was your main aim with Wednesdays?

KL: To illustrate how you can change the landscape of a place if you're not satisfied with what it has to offer, and to show video works that would never get shown here.

SM: How did it work with your other projects?

KL: It's an expansion of my practice. I like to avoid accepted exhibition structures. Having openings every Wednesday for a month at 9pm was a change for the city. We tied in the openings with other events like Pig Out's first show and my painting show at The Bicycle Thief, a bar where everyone was going after openings. I thought I'd cut out the gallery entirely on that one.

SM: A distinct picture of contemporary London came through in Mark Leckey's Londonatella, with its bricolage of culled media representations of the city, sashayed by a duo of beautiful, detached actors, and the drift, amid the banality and entropy of contemporary London, of Oliver Payne and Nick Relph's 'Driftwood', whose poetic narration states "Nobody knows London. There is no knowledge which can understand it." Can you describe what led you to choose these works?

KL: They both describe London in a way that is literal as well as romantic. At the same time as celebrating its infamy and opportunity, they're totally pessimistic. I mean London's a shit hole you know?! But that's what makes it so fun. Centuries of bad planning and wrong choices piled on top and it kind of leaks out in people's attitude. Londoners are products of the city's history. Like it has this warped sense of history and self-promotion, but it just doesn't know what it represents anymore. Leckey's vision is a true and honest representation of the feel of the place because my friends and I spent our time hanging out, drinking, and posing in Soho but also wishing destruction on the place!

SM: Your curatorial strategy with Wednesdays was an artist's strategy in the sense that it was about getting something done with the resources available. Also, rather than trying to find major sponsorship, you chose to put these works in an impermanent exhibition with an emphasis on socialisation, late-night opening times, and tie-ins with music events. On top of creating an entirely new, non-historically-loaded space for the apprehension of the work, many of which were being encountered by a New Zealand audience for the first time, this method of exhibition also rather appropriately framed the work. I'm thinking of 'Driftwood's' portrayal of skateboarders using urban space for their own purposes, to "navigate [their] city by alternative means". Can you talk a little about what 'alternative means' might be in terms of the artist-as-curator?

KL: When you're too skint for the bus, walking or skating opens you up to the opportunity to discover your city. Walking is the poor person's mode of transport, that's why he's the richer man than the guy in the chauffer-driven car.

SM: With the rise of Biennials promoting a homogenisation and decontextualisation of work the decision to show a group of young New Zealand video artists alongside the British work made Wednesdays' programming quite unique.

KL: Go Wild in the Country [a survey of young NZ video art that opened the series] provided a context the audience could relate to and was a good starting point. Many NZ video artists are still working within the accepted boundaries of recent video work, work that was big in the '90s. Chris Cudby stood out for me and he's a musician and curator. Whenever you get people who are not involved solely in visual art, you get freer, more resonant work, in my opinion. Nathan Pohio, who closed the series, was cool because he had a local following and falls between the two camps. He's dealing with issues that have local and international resonance. He's an astute and undervalued NZ artist.

SM: Are you hoping to extend Wednesdays?

KL: Between touring and making work, sure! The idea is to present it in conjunction with a club night afterwards.

SM: Would you ever think of taking work from New Zealand back to England?

KL: I think it needs addressing. NZ is a unique mix of historic cultural baggage. It necessitates an impartial view because if it's done badly it could cause a ten-year setback in the perception of what is going on here. Ideally a gallery abroad would offer me the opportunity of doing it. Somewhere hot! I'd take Pig Out and Golden Axe, Chris Cudby's band, and we'd tear the place apart!

SM: Oliver Payne and Nick Relph are not media-shy about the fact that they were 'expelled from' and 'failed' art school. You knew them around that time; what year did you get up to?

KL: The media likes to market people rather than dealing with a layered truth. They were initially cast as rebels, like they were marched from the gates! Neither I, nor Oliver, placed much interest in school at that point. One Sunday, he said "I've got a project due Monday" so I helped him put together a film from all the funny stuff he'd shot and made a soundtrack with broken acoustic guitars recorded onto a Dictaphone, like a skate video without the skating, but really beautiful. I left my degree after two years. I didn't feel they could teach me anything more and it was expensive to study so I went to work in a clothes shop in Soho. Nick wasn't really a part of that circle when I met all those guys, Ol, Timo, Ash [Lange] and [Nicky] Verber [Herald Street directors, representing Nick Relph and Oliver Payne]. We took advantage of our superior social skills and made the most of what was happening at that time in London. Those guys looked very sharp and raised my appreciation for clothes to the point it almost bankrupted me! We were all so skint. I remember Ol living on onion sandwiches for a while! I met Relph later, after they had started making films together. Nick is a very sharp guy with a lot of style and really into The Fall.

SM: In your own work, there seems to be an intricate exchange between your artistic and musical identities. Sometimes watching you live on stage it appears as though the atmosphere of your paintings has been animated! In your recent show at Room 103, [artist run space in Auckland] you place your own image as another iconic symbol within your pantheon of motifs: the artist as his own ultimate work of art, but one tempered with an appropriate degree of fashion-mag flatness, with references to a more primitive design era, say, a Face magazine photo-shoot from the mid '80s.

KL: I'm interested in the cyclic movement of fashion and the way it reflects social aspirations. Looking back, it's easier to dissemble what was being emoted and it gives you a clue about where you come from and that informs our contemporary situation. The collages were a way of celebrating my own collection of Casual-era clothes, not a self-portrait exactly but a character that is part of my upbringing. I would also relate it to an interest in layout techniques rather than anything to do with the status of portraiture. I like the possibilities and personal history associated with collage and it's nice to use your own body sometimes.

SM: You often draw on autobiographical material for your work, but the world you present is not diaristic, it's a complex symbolic universe that has included the Hacienda club in Manchester, Factory records, references to Constructivism in 80s design, northern English industrial architecture, bad civic murals, rave culture, prismatic shapes, painterly-ness and trompe-l'oeil, combined with a highly convincing articulation and consistency, as opposed a glib accumulation of pop-junk cultural iconography. Musical cultures are often critical of wider culture and I get the sense - and other people have talked about it, too - that you want to make art that has the same sensibility, and the same level of personal substance, as music does.

KL: I relate to the purity of its communication. I'm not interested in art world esoterica. I grew up in the north of England during the recession when the local TV news was always, 'This factory is closing,' or, 'That mine is closed.' At the same time there was energy in the music and style coming out of the place. I was the only person from my year who went to art school to study fine art. There was an exciting dichotomy I was aware of, the idea that leisure pursuits could be more beneficial than working in a traditional industry and I think about my old school and how I grew up all the time. It haunts me. I write about it in my songs and make paintings of empty factories!

SM: Every time I visit your apartment there seems to be a new series of work on the walls. We could call you prolific! What are you working on at the moment?

KL: Paintings and collages for a show at Michael Lett in Auckland, provisionally titled 'Work it!' They deal with industrial product branding and its similarity to club flyers. I'm making an album of 4/4 house tracks out of factory and office noise to play over the top of the show and a video where I play a character who goes off to work at a factory in club gear. But the factory turns into my studio and then into a club, and it's surrounded by a field full of horses so it will look pretty strange. It's about the decline of mechanised employment and the rural fantasy of leisure time. Pig Out is playing the opening. It's going to be a ball!

wednesdays gallery can be contacted at the following email: wednesdaysgallery@hotmail.com

Artbash review of Simon Denny's 'Old Things' at Michael Lett



for a while I was posting sporadic comments to the Artbash site, under the name of IBID. this was a the most substantial, and was less a response to John Hurrell's review of Simon Denny's show than an offhand re-situating of some of the gathered fragments of response to shows penned while wandering around Auckland after my internship at the Govett Brewster...

the original link is here

---





some notes on Simon's show, from my Auckland notebook...


Wandering among the dense meshes, the complex constellations of objects present in Old Things, the latest manifestation of Simon Denny’s anti-monumental sculptural practice, we encounter a Kitset shelf that the artist has assembled, then sliced into two halves, and then sanded back until the pattern of the formica is no longer a woodgrain.

Similar processes are brought to bear on clothing. A jumper is carved into, its softness rigidified, its arms shortened and a bowl-like spatial gape created, which is then threaded with long strings of wool which render it harplike, guitarlike. The jumper’s stitches are made to announce themselves in their reversal, their unravel, and its substance is tweaked for its latent movement, the temporality embedded in its slow and careful threads.

But to pause on that last sentence: Is this jumper handknitted? I suspect not. And as such the unravelling of its stitches is the unravelling, not of the patient effort of a grandmother with her grandchild’s smiling face in mind, but of an automated process. The crux of the matter comes when you start to think of making – what jumper is homemade now? What shelf is built ‘from scratch’? These are all domesticated readymades. They speak of the relation of design, the readymade, technology, and "the gesture".

What is happening when a plastic woodgrain becomes unreadable and is stripped toward “more of a motley cloudy colour” - we are speaking of the exposure of a material whose ‘realness’ confounds the very notion of the real.

other pieces can be seen to share this methodology.
literal performance elements incorporated in Denny’s work run almost seamlessly into the rest of the work, for Denny, art seems always a mode of performance, a way of forms being in time. Their display and aestheticisation is not an activity separated from the life of objects. In this sense the building of the shelf is demonstative, performative. This activity is embedded within the object as it stands. firmly defined forms here can be seen to contain a history (of the rejection of form, and it’s subsequent reinvestment with meaning.) (it is in this way that the works can seem like insects paused halfway through metamorphosis, hybrid art-historical incidents)

Laminates are most commonly used to protect kitchen furniture and surfaces from staining as a result of spillage. They were first utilised in design by the Memphis group, many of whose pieces were coated in brightly, colourful laminates, this material specifically chosen because of its obvious ''lack of culture''.

here is a juncture where the reaction against the formal restrictions of the 1960s by the Memphis designers conflates with Gordon Matta-Clark’s building cuts. The latter’s failure to survive in their sited actuality is here resuscitated from the flatness of its documentary photographs, and recontextualised, in both a bookmarking of their physical history, and a downsizing of their monumental quality to site this history, not at the end of any art historic trajectory but in parallel relation to other histories of art objects, art, and objects. In referencing the Memphis group we should also pause here to remember that the group’s over the top flippancy, was itself a response to the bland seriousness of 1970s design, its founders ostensibly incorporating the self-delineated lifespan of a fad (1981-1988) but these days seven years seems like a pretty long fad, as Denny well knows. The world’s attention span has got a lot shorter in the interem, but Denny’s sculptures patiently connect us to the material world, as quiet as silkworms going about their business.

We can approach commodity culture as a kind of homage to things which is loaded with historic narratives but also very much about the operational now in which these things are apprehended, as long as we trust in the reading, as long as we give it time, to re-imagine the detail lost, the relations lost, we imagine a spirit pervading the things of the world which harks back to the early days of mass production, it is part Bauhaus, in the sense of the latter’s attention to touch. To the borderland where the handmade becomes the automated. Where mistakes of uniqueness can happen. There is nothing numb about these activities of watching and finding. Instead, here to spectate is to participate – they are the same thing. This reading is also a kind of Braille. The eye is an ear is a hand, and to engage is to earth oneself – to touch wood.

drifting observatories

Margot Didsbury and Fiona Connor's mobile vernacular photographic project Drifting Observatories included a catalogue essay by me, reprinted below.

there's an online record of the catalogue here

"The Drifting observatories project, is an investigation on a global scale at an individual level. 15 disposable cameras were sent to a mix of people in America, Antarctica, Australia, Brazil, China, England, Finland, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Poland, Russia, Tanzania and Thailand. Each participant was given complete creative control over the 27 exposures, with the only confines being to use them over the same designated week of November 7-14, 2005. On return, every frame has been printed in a large format to be exhibited on a national tour"

---


Seven days of seeing: the archive and the instant in Drifting Observatories

1

Looking to the walls, you find a loose narrative scudding itself along a series of images like stones thrown over the surface of a lake:

a) a tree trunk, over exposed and seemingly phosphorescent with miniscule forest organisms, looming out of a dusk leaf-littered forest, its pale and ghostly quality offset by a moonlike light stipple, flawing the image, just to its right.

b) a blinding light at the end of a passageway seemingly radiating a mirrored infinitude of architectural partitions towards you, all substance seemingly becoming an effect of this reverberence.

c) a disco ball throwing out a shatter of illuminated shards onto a wall, next to a red velvet curtain in a domestic environment, its glamour decidedly homely, connoting parties in which a late night suspension of disbelief wedded to low-lit theatricality is all that is needed to transform an ordinary living room.

Sometime before the arbitrariness of these hints at meaning can really solidify into a line, a branching into a further layer of images occurs. They crowd into the tenuous thread of your narrative with a noise of alternate start-points and trajectories: animals, people, beer bottles, blurred shapes moving through space, tattered billboards, public squares, cheap wooden chairs: the great raucous clamour of the visual world.

2

With the stringency of its parameters in continual exchange with the informality of its results, Margot Didsbury and Fiona Connor’s collaborative photographic project Drifting Observatories suggests, at least initially, a discord of method: the sensibility dormant in the first part of the equation seemingly in direct conflict with the implied science of the second – how, exactly, does an observatory drift?

An experimental documentary of sorts, in its ongoing negotiation between the factual and the gestural, Drifting Observatories suggests both as alternate strategies brought to the everyday usage of photography. Its two artists, in the role of curator-catalysts, as instigators and careful mediators of its stock of images, give over wholly the creation of its content to 15 photographer-participants, each instructed to use up the 27 frames of a disposable film camera within the strict parameters of a one-week durational framework. This lets the work both ‘create itself’ and allows a variety of unknown gestures fall inside certain delineated (‘documentary’) parameters – while still remaining heavily indebted to ideas around the idiosyncrasies, the ‘sketchiness’ of human inscription. There are, deliberately, no recognisable names on Connor and Didsbury’s list of photographers – the participants are sourced from the artists’ own extended global social networks, in deference to New Zealand’s social nomadism and small-population interconnectedness: our ‘one to two degrees of separation’. Within its formal, chronological groupings Drifting Observatories preserves a sense of flow in its images, which in their intimate, snapshot informality often look like working sketches for other moments, unfinished, tenuously pressed within their chemicals.

The balance between the boundedness of a closed system of possibilities and the unbounded openness of the real is further suggested by the strategic use of disposable film cameras to capture the images. Unlike the non-linearity of digital imaging, each click of the filmic shutter is as much a passage away from a possibility as it is a drawing towards others, a choice made which cannot then be unmade. Still, these are anti-iconic images, largely evacuated of the trace, long retained in the Western pictorial tradition, of the religious iconographic, in which a picture is a conduit to transcendence, a portal to the divine, an object pregnant with presence. Their drive, instead, is not toward verticality but horizontality. Grouped into blocks, they are situated, not as solitary visual incidences, but inside their connectivity as a visual system, or series of systems. Within the exhibition space, they radiate lines outward toward each other across continents and personal styles, forming echoes, tracing patterns and morphological similarities. The viewing eye is in drift across this process, begun in the formative and continued in receptive stages of the work, embedded in the way that the images are conceived and the way in which they are received as meaning, their existence as working documents traced and retraced within dense webs of visual and social signification.

3

While spanning the global, Drifting Observatories’ methodology, clearly, is not about an overview, the kinds of totalising image-gathering strategies which inform mass-mediated spectacle, the visual hegemonies of Globalisation, or the traditional conception of observation that grounds it as point of fixity, staking the eye’s centre point into territory, a spike around which the mind can wind a glossy, victorious flag of generalised meaning. It is instead about the acceptance – embracing – of the partial and distinctly homely view, finding as much difference as can be found in a series of parallel experiences in 15 places, framing, within different kinds of visual languages, the sights out one’s own window, wherever that window may be situated.

Communication via instantaneous images is, increasingly, the currency of contemporary life, rendering the gallery space an ambiguous refuge from a visual polyphony which outshouts any notion of contemplative silence. As a non-linear, non-hierarchical view into image production in the early 21st century, Drifting Observatories links the proliferation of images in everyday life to the immateriality of current cultural production. It’s focus is not on the art object as static entity with cultural and economic weight as much as it is the process whereby these images are produced, charting the drift of the visual, inside the global roaming of community, envisaging the informational webs that connect person to person as we traverse the globe, and the ways in which, via our technologies, communication becomes less inhibited by geographical distance, less about literal objects of exchange.

The project can be said to be less about picturing place as definitive and bounded zone than about apprehending its mobility in an ongoing series of gestures, with the walking while framing these photos conceived as part of the image making process itself – there are as many photographs of passageways here as there are of rooms. This methodology extends to exhibition strategy also, with the travelling of the exhibition nationwide, from city to city, to a variety of different public and private spaces, each re-siting shifting a patchwork of significances within the images themselves.

In this, the exhibition’s realisation is a reiteration of the social realities of its inception. Not simply a record of the ways in which people interact with the visual material of their lives, or an exercise in foregrounding photography as social technology or communicative media, Drifting Observatories is in effect a visual graph of community, a curatorial strategy that works to expose the existence of informal, largely uncodifiable networks – the intuitive, ever-shifting fluency and vitality of our social worlds. If process-based art ideally requires an extended, ongoing, developmental relationship with its subject, then social relationship provides the ideal model. Here the two are literally intertwined.

4

The patina of distance that time lends vernacular photographs inevitably makes their object-status all the more solid. But what of the informality and transparency of contemporary family photographs, unable to be codified via the stiff tableaux of Victorian times, or the more recent quirkiness of that 70s hairstyle or 80s t-shirt, these sketches of the here, the now, whose ordinariness and contemporaniety renders them, outside personalised context, near-worthless, near-invisible? It is important to note that the photographs that comprise the content of Drifting Observatories are not ‘found’ - this is no exercise in nostalgia, nor does it posit the curatorial or collection exercise as thrift-store rescue mission – a process that filmmaker Agnes Varda has termed ‘gleaning’. If Drifting Observatories is a form of visual ecology, its methods are subtler ones than these. There is, accordingly, no weight of melancholy – the subjects have not yet grown out of and away from their representations, they are still analogue to their images, lending these images intimacy, casualness, lightness, life. If its formal processes annex it to photographic technologies rapidly becoming superseded, it is also clearly about the ways in which the internet and mobile phones have reconfigured what place photography – and the shifting glitter of our visual landscape – can hold inside our experience.

If Drifting Observatories is an image bank of visual scraps that strategically preserves specificity as positive value, it is also a model for a way of organising information, placing the power to organise imagery into the hands of those who wield its most humble, throwaway technologies. If its images resist the drive toward the representative and general, and instead preserve the idiosyncrasy of cultural specificity and the local knowledge of friendship, familiarity and family, they suggest further gaps which can be filled by other, future linkages, and in this, an opening out toward further, active participation by the viewer in the life of his/her own images. Drifting Observatories has no specific agenda, it simply shows, as if through a series of shifting windows, certain decisions made about the visible aspects of the contemporary world, as it was apprehended in the space of one week, through a series of eyes that are particular, named, known. What happens in these images may still shift depending on context: a house, a gallery, a café. The project is itself in drift, and these thin passageways between identities, these unknowns and in-betweens, connote the possibility of a world in which communication is possible, in which multiple ways of seeing can exist in dialogue, in which views do not replace each other but know the value of existing simultaneously.

Sally Ann McIntyre, February 2006

i will make time to write a response to a show


[a catalogue text written for an exhibition at
SHOW, an artist-run project space in central Wellington run from 2004-2006 by Jenny Gillam and Eugene Hansen. SHOW was described as having "a focus on exhibiting projects by artists who have established experimental, conceptual and research-based practices". The instructions for the act of writing this particular text were that it must be completed while invigilating the gallery.]

----

the durational boundedness suggested to me by the instructions on the wall is an intriguing one: ok, I set the following conditions: I will make time to write a site-specific, time-dependent response to a show in a space I do not know in Wellington, I will sit in the space for three hours, which is two and a half hours longer than the average duration of an exhibition’s spectatorship, and this response to an unknown room will take all of that time. The responsiveness will furthermore not be a blank slate as recent marginalia travels with me to inform my impressions of the space, the screen: this lack of editing-out and attention to textual genetics both a disinclination to state a single point of authorship and more selfishly a momentary docking point for my nomadism after strategic banalities entering Wellington by bus from New Plymouth:


paddock paddock paddock paddock field staked a generality: grey painted structures dominate a slowing: trees straighten in groups toward the contracting blue inserts in palimpsests of mist:


various manifest potentials suggest themselves, at the point where the arrangement of words and ideas and objects clicks and stutters in an unresolved immediacy. I am initially reminded, as I sit down behind the desk, of Adrian Piper’s stint as conceptual receptionist. Then I am not thinking but writing and find the initial nod toward description stakes its claim: I find myself inside an authorless blur poised where interdisciplinary and collaborative practices join the highly social space where the gallery rests. Process heightened by the voices of the exhibiting artists haunting the room, tossing around initial ideas for its title. This, one of two soundscapes layering their spatial spill against an open window’s distant street noises. The spill of light and sound into the space reminds that an open window can be a work. Another kind of window in a video loop, infinitely extending the puzzling of a Rubiks cube’s bounded set of strategies, points toward play which destabilizes a deferred correctness.


as description catches fire: there is no static point to the sunlight: real is green and full of charge: constellations: the clustered points of birds as the land flats drain through the greens and browns of my eye’s continuance of windows: of its failure to hold a moment as a growth ring: Palmerston North: cygnets in the Winter Garden.


here, museology is given an oblique spin, the white cube is set among other primary colours, in a toy like an interactive Mondrian, among the testing of a set of combinations which mimes creativity’s frustrations and possibilities. The thin clicking of the lines falling into momentary place is stretched to an uneasy, droning soundscape as I move around the space and notice the layering of detail, the dense inter-referentiality which a collaborative working methodology promotes. There is a visual echo of the toy grid in the equally vernacular grids of the blue and green carpet, set with its slightly off-centre red carpet square cut to floorplan: the filled space preserved as a picture of its previous emptiness, but red is, conversely, presence. The hot point of a larger space, reminding of the rooms which have been sectioned off to create its vantage point for art: a strategic viewing platform. A penciled floorplan on a wall adjacent contributes its sketchy maths to this thought. And a silver ruler’s numbers can’t be argued with, as they set up a relation to a shelf of foil-bound texts indented with typeset


a sky where stateless atomisations fail to rain: where water powder drifts. where colours force toward soft greys in regress: bird flocks’ chaotics: a grouping by invisible hollows: a loose ink-dipped wing like a way of saying never resting not yet: a hollow where breathing forms: having never folded into the form of a paper space, an arm’s crook, a tongue’s impress:


the formal stacking of a dog bed’s coloured cushions echoes a set of steps which lead to a viewing platform and down. There is no view, and nowhere to get to but here. The text in place of the mountainous vista is an email, another layer of documentation which, ostensibly functional, in its way re-states a methodology: “these new shifts are permanent, cheers”. A stack of atlases supports the table where I write, their compacted linear geographies the tectonic strata of a world concertinaed into text and sign. I recall, like a further contextual layering, the veinlike highways of Vivien Atkinson’s work in the Christmas show at Enjoy, seen yesterday


a day in stacks: the relation held by domes and folds: small teams of terms: monochrome spatial shelves: repetition incomplete, these loops collide in imperfect rings:


to spend this time sitting Show’s space is to find a partial view, above all it is to inhabit space as though inhabiting a question, and to filter that time through the only words that can be made to mean within the time allotted, I find my place as shifting, and what can be said as a concentrated note taking, and now these shifts are permanent, and my time is done, cheers.


Sally Ann McIntyre

1-4pm, Dec 15 2005


I wrote a review of a group show called Breathing Space, shown at the Physics Room, for Christchurch's Presto magazine...

----

breathing space

Bekah Carran, Regan Gentry, Shaun Gladwell, Maddie Leach, Nathan Thompson, P. Westbourne

The Physics Room, 6 th - 30 th April

Wandering into a Christchurch winter sans car, my thoughts quickly turn to my umbrella, a svelte and slender creature from the early 20 th century with (if you’ll forgive the fetishist’s attention to minutiae) a long silver pinnacle spike and tooled black crocodile leather handle. Unfurling this wonderfully graceful and culturally loaded object, which is really less a thing than a ‘vehicle’ (in the sense of a transformative spatial possibility) always seems a quiet clarion call to a less utilitarian existence. The appeal of umbrellas has to do with the zone of selfhood they open up, which, due to their embedded sense of near-flaneuristic dalliance, encourages introspective slowness. Functioning as the small roof of an illusory portable room, which nevertheless the body inhabits as though it were a space, an umbrella in rainy weather is an exceptionally comforting ‘breathing space’, whereby, sheltered both from the sight of others and from the wide grey vistas of sublimity that the sky holds, the ‘outside’ is, for a moment, scaled to more intimate, more human dimensions. Under an umbrella there is room and time to stroll about, and to think, and to look at things. It frames the outer world just as it constructs a certain type of contained individuality, a typically elusive sense of personhood, through its delimited solitariness. As such, it arises out of the same post-Enlightenment spectatorship base as the traditional experience of visiting an art gallery, and becomes an exceedingly good, if appropriately digressive, vantage point from which to begin to look at the group show breathing space.

breathing space is concerned with ‘leisure and its relationship to the contemporary art gallery’, and from the outset, P Westbourne’sRain Song declares the show’s focus to be less about ‘easily consumable leisure events’, or products and activities designed as ‘entertainments’ by the monolithic cultural entities of hyper-capitalism, than about how art can function as a zone in which to isolate and frame those ever-diminishing small, private, playful experiences of ‘free time’, and understand them as personally valuable. Recorded in Bergen, “one of the rainiest cities in the world”, Rain Song is an audio work comprised of field recordings of rain hammering against the outer fabric of an umbrella. Situated in the Physics Room’s foyer area, the work literally meets you at the door, and as such functions in the wider context ofbreathing space as threshold, a sonic sorbet that cleans the sensual palette of everyday assumptions about the ways in which artworks, spectators, and bodies inhabit space. The work is deceptively simple, and in playing back an extended moment of the everyday, which would normally flow by us as unrecorded sonic blind-spot, the sensual properties of that moment are vividly transferred. To stand underneath the cone speaker, substituted here for the umbrella’s improvisational ‘drum skin’, is to be aware of how much of our embodied experience is linked to audibility, as the ‘spectatorship’ of such a work becomes as much to do with the skin prickling on your arms as small hairs stand on end, and with the relaxing of your stomach muscles in response to the inherently comforting reverberations of rain, as it does the experience of seeing. The situating of a sound work in a group show comprised mainly of visual work, is in itself a pointer to a more fluid apprehension of art’s placing, as sound is inherently uncontainable by walls, and as such will influence the viewer’s experience of other works.

Walking, then, into breathing space, other free time activities which emphasise solitary space and patience rather than collective consumption and instant gratification are encountered, including the jigsaw puzzle (a more indoor ‘rainy day’ activity), referenced in Regan Gentry’s Re-jigged, although here, instead of fitting together seamlessly, the bright touristic optimism of a New Zealand “teatowel” style map is atomised to a kind of join the dots exercise which will never be finished. The experience of looking out the window becomes a dreaming reverie of transformative and mutative potential in Bekah Carran’s view from my window, in which, much like the forests invading the boy protagonist’s bedroom in seminal children’s story Where the Wild Things Are, the vegetation of the ‘outside’ permeates ‘inside’. Carran’s strikingly crafted urban weeds creep through the floorboards to investigate ideas about the hardiness of city sensibilities, the crossover of the fine arts and street art, and the permeation of the gallery space’s sterile enclosures with ‘viral’ narratives. Shaun Gladwell’s Tangara is a videoed performance of pure play, which pictures the artist in a public tram, hanging upside down on a railing. The image is inverted to suggest anti-gravity, expressing a wish to invert the assumptions we, as spectators, bring to everyday physical phenomena. Tangara also exposes the science fiction films and novels it references as fantasies of escape which, even when enacted with no resources, still transform space in the richness of the human imagination. Maddie Leach’s The Lilac Ship is similarly lo-fi in its visual depiction of a large ocean liner setting off on a voyage, connoting the social and private spaces enabled by ship travel, and the slowness and sublimity of seaward staring eyes. Projected onto the wall, its frame becomes a portal through the gallery space and out into the drift of imaginings both romantic and banal. Gentry’sTakeaways suggests that the activity par excellence of contemplative solitude is, of course, the museum or art gallery visit. A factory line of plaster-of-paris heads, cast from the artist’s own, wait quietly in line for their turn on a pedestal which, instead of elevating them into a museological permanence, will slowly turn them, via a sheet of sandpaper connected to a mechanism, into a pile of white dust. Deconstructing the classical bust, and also the modernist myth of the artist as ‘genius’, Gentry’s time-based installation also, quite wonderfully, seems to pastiche later histories of violent anti-establishment and self destructive gestures by (male) artists, with its inherent gentle politeness. Nathan Thompson’s Busytown is based on the artist’s apprehensions of the dislocating experience of moving to the big city, and as such, initially seems to form a counterexample to the intimate scale of the other works in breathing space. But on closer inspection, it is evident that the models made to represent the city are small in scale, clunkily made, with banks of flashing L.E.Ds glimmering sequinlike from their cardboard facades. The work evokes city wandering, spectatorship and dislocation, and the non-abject melancholy of the flaneur. Sound and image combine to produce phantasmagoric intimations of b-grade and early film, and long gaps in both sound and image play with the audience’s expectations of ‘entertainment’, ushering in the by-now familiar concepts of patience, solitude, open-endedness, the onus on personal response, and the inversion of expected experience, which are true of the show as a whole.

Sally Ann McIntyre

I reviewed the show Ayeion Thales, by James Ormond Wallace, a retrospective show put together by James' friends Nathan Poiho, Robert Hood and Paul Johns, for Presto magazine.

a trust has recently been set up in James' name
here


---

James Ormond Wallace

Ayeion Thales

SoFA Gallery 19 Oct – 28 Nov 2004

Australian broadcaster and writer Robert Dessaix advises potential inhibitors of the radio waves that the ideal would-be voice used when broadcasting is slightly fragile, appearing as if addressed to an audience of one, an imagined person who is ‘known, trusted but not uncritical’.

The space which opens for inhabitation by your listener(s) is then a personal one, in which, however anonymously, you are ‘known’, and they ‘know themselves’. Radio’s intimate space reminds me of the similarly mediated performative spaces suggested by James Ormond Wallace in his series of videos, which are points charged with communicative potential. Here, the camera becomes ‘imagined other’ in Wallace’s videoed performances, which in turn become the portals through which we are invited into a relation, focused at a variety of points variously identified with the subject. The camera is repository for improvised musings, and with it we are led through the mythic/familiar spaces of Hagley Park, like Gerard de Nerval’s lobster on a blue ribbon. It gives us images of the artist as sensitive, imaginative outsider, which Wallace climbs into like a series of second-hand suits and proceeds to take for a latter-day flaneur’s stroll through the familiar, punctuated by endearingly purple prose, a series of half-improvised, half over-determined visual and linguistic images of his city, where he grasps at beautiful and banal straws, finds pearl necklaces in the gutter, and pathos in the decaying Dickensian facades and grungy inner spaces of the labyrinthine High Para building. It suggests an eternal loop in which the Hammer Horror humour of the theatricality of death remains forever unresolved, in the ragged and stuttered lo-fi of broken media, of pixelated rewind and retake. It is benevolent, non-voyeuristic watcher over two sleeping human animals in bed with identical heart-marked white t-shirts on, in a work which sets up a relationship with the sculptural candy hearts trailing red cotton thread on the adjoining wall, originally shot, like Jarman-esque Sebastian/Cupid offerings, over the inner city spaces of High Stret. It is an outpost of the body, sharing its visceral fragility, as in a sequence pitting the camera, without a shred of photo-journalistic neutrality, but with something approaching the rush of desire, backing around a room against the thrusts of manic kitchen knife play. Then, abruptly, the worm turns, the camera is tossed between subjects, and the hand with the knife is also holding the camera, in a quick reversal of the eye as opening, site of puncture, to the eye as phallic and threatening. It moves forward to carve space sculpturally, becoming bull-like to the opposing identity’s proffered red rag. The camera attacks, the camera is attacked, it is like a boundary-testing dialogue. We are investigated for our loyalties and our imaginative expansiveness, and not once allowed to rest on our laurels, to be the invisible observer(s). Throughout all the incarnations wielded by Wallace, his camera, and by extension his viewers, can fall into dreams and wanderings, but it/we is/are never allowed to be ‘uncritical’.

The potential of the hand-held camera to delimit spaces of intimacy, that reference the intimacies of other eras and forms, of the Wordsworthian monologue, the painterly eye, the contested, collegial oppositional space of friendship, is elevated into another space via the video Wallace made in other spaces. Not obviously a New Zealander in another place, this is a filmmaker using the techniques of the outsider to feel at home in dis-placement. The amateur theatrics are less joyously fresh, less obviously personalised, less ‘art school’, perhaps, and embedded in a more complex schema, a wrestling with the iconic power of recorded images and the flows and undercurrents which undercut them. At the rim of a recurring image of stagnant ponds, the camera is there, wanting to plunge in like a butterfly net, to dredge the depths beyond the visual rim of crusty green sludge. It is there to collect personalised, non-touristic footage from Europe’s public spaces which intercut and intertwine through an imagistic stockpile – teeming invertebrate life, sad humanoids in museological cabinetry – like fever-dream poetic flipcards, their simplicity often breathtaking, their juxtapositions irreducible, interspersed with the mute narrative theatricality of the sequences with a statuesque, wig-swapping, part-Asian beauty, gripping a kitchen knife, staring out a castle window, and picking pastoral apples in a gothic horror imbued with the medieval drama of a postcolonial Lord of the Rings. Partly edited in-camera, a whole gamut of techniques sees time played with, pixels breaking up the screen, horses’ tails flipping backwards, to a soundtrack of guitar loops and ambient noise that preserves the half-improvised tone of the vocal musings in Wallace’s earlier works and introduces a less obviously personalised thematic which makes it strikingly evident that my being held in thrall by this work for its entire duration – and it is long – is transcendent of the respect-paying sadness of being here, at a retrospective exhibition for an artist born the same year as myself, in a gallery which, itself imperilled with threats of closure by University funding cuts, is invaluable in terms of providing room and time to re-pose the work of local graduates like Wallace, becoming in itself a space of relation and intimacy which does not lack bite, ‘known, trusted but not uncritical’, in the best sense.

Sally Ann McIntyre

projekt# video art show at the physics room

a catalogue essay for the video art compilation Projekt# appeared in the Physics Room Annual 2004

it is online here

---

Projekt#.
Essay by Sally Ann McIntyre

Dick Higgins, Fluxus artist and writer, wrote in 1966 that ‘much of the best work being produced today seems to fall between media’. No real coincidence, then, that while having origins in the filmic and radiophonic technological developments of the early twentieth century, video art’s emergence from the nascent technologies of television also happened around this time. Now 40 years old, video is, arguably, the predominant postmodern meta-medium in its capacity to mix and dissolve the boundaries between media, to combine with and expand media, and to provide commentary on contemporary media saturated social realities. An invaluable insight into recent Australian video art, Projekt#, curated by Brendan Lee, is a travelling video archive documenting the work of artists using video in art contexts, much of which was originally destined for showing in the gallery space. Projekt# serves a dual function; to gather and document the localised history of video in Australia, and to serve as distribution system for new artists working within the genre.

Video art’s roots in the domestic space of television afford it an intimacy unknown to film, and personal video recorders have collapsed the distinction, preserved in film, between lived reality and the space of the media. Reality television is the most explicit statement of this. Artists in the Projekt# series draw upon such ideas in a variety of ways, including exploring the potential of home video and the internet to document hidden aspects of domestic realities. Kathy Bossinakis’ cry, for example, shows a markedly abject, adolescent-sociopathic list of (obviously fake) tortures enacted by a central female character on a cat, like Carolee Schneemann without the utopianism, as seen through the warped lens of the Chapman brothers. Elsewhere, in Matthew Griffin’s All eyes on Amin a dead girl on a pristine white ground spews blood from her mouth to a soundtrack of speed metal. More stark and simple gestures are foregrounded in Lyndal Jones’crying man 1, which in its depiction of a man crying against a bluescreen background is a succinct statement of video’s potential to zoom in both neutrally and incisively on the human subject. Jones’ piece was also shown as it was installed in a gallery setting, an attempt to portray the way in which the audio echoes in the space, and the way in which sound is, necessarily, an important component of video work.

The loop as a structural device is seen most succinctly in Emil Goh’s 1 minute at 9, and Daniel von Sturmer and Meri Bazevski’sDriveway Sequence, both of which use editing techniques to restructure linear concepts of time into lulling repetitive mantras. Leslie Eastman’s two works, Eraserhead and Several Provisional Contingencies not necessarily precluding the eventuality of Reconciliatory Union utilise similar concepts toward a reinvigoration of the medium of drawing, with each sketchy gesture enacted by the artist resisting the pull toward finality and definitiveness through the potential of video editing to rewind and erase events. The influence of popular culture - especially, perhaps, the music video - is everywhere, whether this be literally, in Philip Brophy’s clip for Honeysmack, which, referencing the cross-dressing Freddie Mercury, traces a musician’s search for his audience around the Melbourne suburbs, or in work such as the Kingpins’ Versus, which uses archival footage from the Leigh Bowery estate to re-enact Aerosmith and Run DMC’s walk this way, in a collaboration that time-leaps to the Eighties.

Britney Spears appears not once but twice, in Kate Murphy’sBritney Love, a faux-documentary biopic that explores the sexualising of prepubescent girl pop culture, and Sue Dodd’sFears for Spears, a performance-based piece that draws heavily both on music video and karaoke. Dodd sets her analysis of celebrity culture and media surveillance to a squelchy electro acid soundtrack, bringing to mind the Grunt Machine video catalogue, seen at the Physics Room in 1999, in which New Zealand artists explored connections between video art and the music video.

Sally Ann McIntyre

DREAMING OF A HAND PAINTED PARADISE - VIEWS OF THE FLAT CITY

[i was commissioned in late 2002 by Tessa Giblin of the Gridlocked project to write a piece on Christchurch public art, which was published on the project's website with a series of images by Steve Kerr, and is now archived here. further art writing for Gridlocked is here]

DREAMING OF A HAND PAINTED PARADISE - VIEWS OF THE FLAT CITY

by Sally Ann McIntyre

all photographs by Steve Kerr

1

We are driving south out of Christchurch, and the urban space contained within the seal of the city's quartet of main avenues, the 'grid' comprised of Fitzgerald, Bealey, Moorhouse and Rolleston, is fraying into the quiet of surrounding suburbs.

An old man wearing what, my co-passenger informs me, is commonly referred to as a 'wife beater' singlet, here teamed with additional faded blue stubbies, is pushing a hand-held mower across his small, already well-clippered lawn. Further toward the outskirts, a line of poplars following the road toward its vanishing point, and marking the edge of what was once a thriving community of market gardens and orchard lands, now frames the fresh-cropped brown brick tones of a gated community, with its attendant satellites of chain stores and supermarkets. One last fruit seller, facing down the imposing red monolith of The Warehouse directly over the Highway, still paints his cheerful signs in white, handwritten letters: Oranges, Apples, Bananas; but the poplars seem tired, their small-town, doors-unlocked optimism re-cast as shabby and ragged by the forces of change gathering behind them.

In their denial of the mnemonic layers of place, in their lack of historical anecdote, and their erasure of the awareness of difference, gated communities such as Christchurch's Northwood embody a paranoiac ideology which seems purely American, seemingly transferred whole and untouched to New Zealand. I wonder, though: couldn't this wilful head-in-the sand attitude to local culture also just be a natural extension of a well-entrenched home grown ethic of suburban privacy?

Northwood might function in this way to deflect Christchurch's awareness of its own most undeniable qualities, as Disneyland does to Jean Baudrillard's America. When faced with the phenomena of these segregated neighbourhoods, I can't help thinking of J. G. Ballard's novel Running Wild, set in the claustrophobic paradise of a fictional gated community called Pangbourne, which breeds a generation of children so sheltered that only the extremity of murderous violence, an act of mass matri/patricide, is enough to crack the shell: "They were choking on the non-stop diet of love and understanding being forced down their throats at Pangbourne Village. This was an idea of childhood invented by adults. The children were desperate for the roughage of real emotions"

This seems, once again, a fairly Americanised solution to the perils of middle class seclusion, and you can't imagine, in the NZ novelistic equivalent, a bunch of Kiwi kids being quite that audacious, or literal. Interestingly, though, before killing their parents, the Pangbourne children kill time in projects that read like parodies of contemporary artworks, and other underground media activities. In the days before Internet chat-rooms, these variable documents of suburban teen stultification include 'The Pangbourne Pang', a desktop-published tabloid specialising in boring news - "Eggs boil in three minutes... Staircase leads to second floor." and Radio Free Pangbourne, a series of cassettes which consist of "random sounds, mostly his own breathing, interspersed with long patches of silence". I wonder what Northwood's growing children are busy tinkering at, in the privacy of their bedrooms?




2


A small cameo of the city by Christchurch poet Jonathan Fisher, a copy of which I had on my fridge for years, reads, in its entirety: In Cathedral square / I am stopped / by a fat American / clad completely in black / who asks / "where can you score / some drugs / and what exactly / can you do in this country / anyway?"

Snapshots of Christchurch in winter: all naked and grey, the city centre emptied of throngs by the lure of four labyrinthine suburban malls, which anchor the city at its cardinal points. Countless small dairies struggle on with scant shelves, their tag-bedecked facades a motley assortment of faded 'Tip Top's and 'Coke is It's. Massage parlours flash blue neon day and night into the C.B.D. At 12:30pm on a Tuesday, a riverside café-bar called The Bohemian is packed full of men in suits from nearby offices. Amongst other advertising images, a billboard asks pedestrians: "what does it profit a man to gain the world, only to lose his own soul?". Close by, a church - housed in a building once a movie theatre - lures the faithful with a logo that bears an uncanny resemblance to the trademark Nike swoosh. A group of four male Samoan teenagers, waiting at a bus stop, break spontaneously into a relaxed, perfectly pitched harmonic vocal improvisation, relieving the monotony of commercial radio leaching into the street from a nearby shop. The famous Edmonds factory building bulldozed in the city's Eastern suburb of Linwood recurs, as a semiotic memory, in a piece of urban stencil graffiti, its sunny 'sure to rise' icon part of a pool of equally familiar vernacular symbols. A young woman with grown-out bleached hair, arguing heatedly with a man on an inner city pavement very early on a weekend morning exclaims loudly and with tremulous emotion: "but we don't even fuck!" An easel painter dabs pale pink watercolour onto acid free paper in the Botanical Gardens at lunchtime, while a group of tourists take his photograph. A group of Bollywood film extras, practicing their dance moves on-site, dressed in cut off denim hot pants and gold sequinned crop tops, shiver visibly in the chill. Vesuvio Café, referenced in songs by Roy Montgomery, adorned with paintings by Bill Hammond and Tony de Lautour, and which, like Mainstreet Café when Kirsty Gregg used to work there, sported a priceless wallpaper montage of original Flying Nun gig posters, lies derelict and gutted behind a flapping wall of black plastic. Outside the Alice in Videoland building, in lieu of pansies or chrysanthemums, a plot of glossy silverbeet grows in a flowerbed, ringed by a lighter green border of curly parsley.


3


How have local art organisations been stirred into responding to the city's particular set of conditions, and how have they worked collaboratively with the shapes of the city? Despite being thoroughly 'Heritaged' in past decades - its official memories public constructs of the town crier, tram, and riverside punting variety - the city has a rich and varied history of public art projects that have done much to call attention, through strategies of shock, humour, and subtlety, to underlying social and cultural issues affecting the city. This has produced art which is interventionist, sited within the codes of advertising or that succeeds in nudging off the patina of the stories a place tells itself in order to reveal its other side(s). Art that tackles issues of regionalism head-on. Art that holds the concerns of particular communities and presents them in a public forum - perhaps not signposted or immediately readable, but noticed.

Many of the most memorable and rewarding of these works were initiated by the South Island Art Projects Trust, which ran as a siteless collective from 1992-6, before morphing into its current incarnation as The Physics Room Trust, with its attendant, currently Tuam St based, gallery space. Most of S.I.A.P's public projects were environmental in nature, and tapped into the history of New Zealand landscape art, fusing it with the European traditions that dematerialised the art object and produced conceptualism, Earth Art and Arte Povera. Some were also a response to urban space, for instance, the urban billboard project Praxis. This, from its press release: "(the project)… challenges perceptions that art in public should always celebrate the apparently positive and marketable aspects of a place concentrating instead on interrogating the assumptions and values which underpin Christchurch and similar late twentieth century cities"

The site-specific group project Thoroughfare: Art on the Southside, exhibited in May 1999 by the Oblique Trust, like its associated project in the West Coast town of Otira, was an opportunity for a group of artists to respond collectively to the historic and aesthetic contexts provided by a group of vacated spaces, this time in the commercially depressed area of Sydenham. Oblique also initiated Kiosk, a public art site still in existence in High Street, now run by the Physics Room Trust, which has promoted small works, pithy, like visual poems, and has itself been the victim of urban vandalism on occasion. A show in the old Wizards video parlour site (the existence of which is now itself impossible, the machines rendered relics, in such a short time), by S*W*A*B Presents, grouped together artists under the thematic banner of the 80s spacie arcade. That's where we first saw Hannah Beehre's stuffed purple, Krishna-armed badger and gangsta goldfish, and got used to Dan Arps' rambling scatter installations. I remember at the opening, an expat', London based friend returned for a holiday commenting on how much life the Christchurch art scene had.

The Art and Industry Biennials have initiated public art projects on a grander and more generously funded scale, first in 2000, and again in 2002, with works such as (to choose one of many) Nathan Coley's The Black Maria, a reference to the first Western film set, which deftly interpreted the physical and semiological landscape from its vantage point on top of the Alice in Videoland building. Looking out from the site of this structure on a city re-cast as 'frontier', with its film-set-like facades, its empty inner city spaces stuck on a loop of urban decay and erasure, an aesthetic felt all the more powerfully with the presence of the work by city communities and the residents of the neighbourhood, and emphasising the need for new approaches to public history and urban preservation.


4


Inevitably, a percentage of the children of Christchurch will grow up to read, to write stories, to draw on the walls, to author a variety of events called, at least in spirit radio free Christchurch. Most of those who find their ways to tertiary institutions, statistics - and experience - tell us, will leave the city right after they graduate, or a few years later. In her dialogue around beginning the Gridlocked project, director Tessa Giblin states that part of her reasoning for doing so was to open up, in the artist run space tradition, local opportunities for her generation of graduates to exhibit on their own terms: to prise apart, as is perhaps every generation's Oedipal prerogative, the gridlock of the current art system. Gridlocked has grown in the intervening time to provide a series of spaces for a variety of works which are often reflexive self-examinations of consumerist habits. In this way their siting in a shop window context is semi-anonymous, but not as traceless as the fully interventionist public art seen in projects such as, for example, the text works by John Barnett and Lesley Kaiser in the early '90s . Zane Smith's Gridlocked installation of found supermarket shopping lists exhibits a near-forensic fascination with the mundane detritus of consumerism, with trash swept up after the supermarket's automatic doors have been locked for the night. These are not wish lists but the most prosaic and realist of documents. Their installed textual patchwork, with layers of scrawling handwriting rendered into blocks, recalls the ordered placing of products on supermarket shelves, or the repetition of the basic dwelling shape in a suburb. The lists also come across as strangely fragile, minimal documents of individual identity, of desire reduced to the material, in a reductive context where such narratives are decided by the items that one chooses to buy, those choices themselves limited to the range of goods to be found on supermarket shelves.

In echoing earlier shop front exhibition projects, Gridlocked's uniqueness is largely one of duration, and perhaps spells the maturing of such artist-run urban art initiatives, no longer the preserve of temporal project-based work by recognisable groups of artists, but instead manifested as an ongoing project reflecting a diversity of institutional voices, with works being sourced via proposal from a wide variety of artists working within the city. Gridlocked also gives a window into how public art projects have changed to meet Christchurch's changing contemporary urbanscape, and proves insight into how the arts culture in New Zealand has changed to soften, somewhat, the nature of such projects. The signs are, however that Gridlocked's next move is out of the shop front and into surrounding urban spaces. Lisa Benson's subtle temporal markings on roads and under cash machines are a gentle foray into urban ambiguity beyond the walls of the installation she placed into Manchester street.

The other site-specific public site that Gridlocked currently forages into is the non-place of the virtual. With its anonymous presentation at street level, unsignposted apart from a web address, Gridlocked gives a technological upgrade to the informational resource of the exhibition catalogue (a closed and linear document), with the open, rhyzomatic documentation of an ever-building catalogue in website form. This also renders the installations available to those on line who would not have the opportunity to encounter (or as Giblin puts it 'chance upon') them in material space, and provides the opportunity for ongoing dialogue around them, of which this essay is one instance. The use of the email-out has also changed the face of small art initiative publicity, providing cheap access to an unlimited database of contacts and largely killing the 80s-90s culture of the grainy photocopy. In response to an email out by the artist, Sera Jensen's work for Gridlocked, 'What do you want for Xmas / What do you wish for Xmas' gathers together a wide range of responses to the above question, succinctly expressing the varied thoughts and silly-season consumerist ethics of Gridlocked's web community.


5

The city is an incredibly aesthetically rich environment, and its signs, official and unofficial, operate as potentially infinite strata of layered references. As urban dwellers, we tend to tread these spaces unconsciously. In the minute-to- minute crush and fold of everyday living, the sites of everyday urban life are experienced as mundane, overlookable, their social and historical significances largely hidden from view. Streets conspire with our linear thoughtpaths, and we do not often wander off into the creative cognitive undergrowth. An individual's sense of place is largely a cultural creation, but such images as are produced and consumed can easily become reduced to the mass-produced clichés of tourist advertising. Yet, our memories are often place-specific, and any neighbourhood - with its particular sounds, sights, smells - is a complex cognitive and emotional conglomerate. To become conscious of - to intervene in urban space - can be done in many ways. It is a favourite strategy for grass roots political activism. Graffiti and tag writing are more identity-driven forms of expressive intervention into a visual landscape largely dominated by the language of advertising. Such acts are indexed to urban discontent and vandalism (but it's also not that simple).

Another, simpler strategy, which leads in turn to all other re-placings, is just to begin to look. The series of photographs by Steve Kerr accompanying this essay are one such instance of looking, and portray a virtual walk down a set of city streets, with an eye attentive to details that recall the post-Glasnost Berlin Wall rendered into a thousand layers of exuberantly multicoloured spray can dialogue, and decades of urban protest involving posters slapped up on walls at midnight, and a knowledge of art practices that speak on the street from within the language of the institution, in order to call attention to its limits. At once public and private, situational and abstract, personified and empty, spiritual and material, historically loaded and historically amnesiac, these images throw up interlocking maps of signs, layers of blind spots, strange imagistic coincidences, juxtapositions of old and new, ghostly inhabitations by past events that linger on. There's the concrete-poetic humour of a vinyl cut, like a gallery one but on the street where a tag would be, that says, simply, 'tagger'. The historical/cultural meatiness of a stencil of Robert Muldoon with accompanying text that reads like a tongue-in-cheek rally call to our culinary past: EAT MORE PIES. The meditative formal beauty of a certain colour combination caught at random on a street corner. The tag, nudging against other cultural forms of expression by its (re)production on a sticker. The pathos in the hand-painted kitsch of a mural of palm trees, a failed utopia hidden down a grungy, out of the way inner city side street.

Some of the subjects of these photographs are made by artists, some are not, some are fleeting and temporal, some are way past their use-by date, but behind all of them there is the desire to embellish, to begin a conversation, to add to one, to make a mark, to act in response to events, with or without training or tools, with or without intellectual sharpness, street knowledge, or the class/educational background which leads to any kind of officially sanctioned, organised critique of the urban environment. It is such images, perhaps, and the acts of looking which produce them, which can footnote the city's hidden cultural life, its hidden consciousness of its own histories, potentialities and dreams. Along with public artwork programs, such small interventions can stimulate new approaches, perhaps encouraging designers, artists and writers, as well as citizens, to finish entirely any "cherished ideas of establishing a Utopia incorporating the best of English tradition" , and contribute their skills and energies, instead, to an urban art of creating a heightened sense of place in the city. Perhaps a child, now a twinkle in the eye of her Northwood dwelling parents, will one day grow up to write a novel about an artist who begins an inventory of the city charting significances unmarked (a huge, Borgesian, impossible task) which takes in the personal significances of every lamppost, every park bench, every footpath. But as another writer has already put it, "Perhaps to find meaning in the present, in a complex structure such as the city - where the pace of life seems to obliterate, disregard, and ride rough-shod over individuals, it is crucial to see this rush toward the future as also part of a legacy… the dreaming always of a 'better place'."